Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature

In this interview, Texas State Representative James Talarico discusses his campaign for the United States Senate and various political issues (0:09).

Key topics include:

Corporate Media and First Amendment Rights (1:51): Talarico criticizes corporate media executives for compromising the First Amendment to gain favor with politicians.

Texas Political Landscape (2:41): Despite Donald Trump winning Texas by a significant margin, Talarico believes Democrats have a chance this year due to growing backlash against extremism and corruption, highlighting a grassroots movement with thousands of volunteers and shattered fundraising records.

Christianity and Politics (4:11): As a Presbyterian seminarian, Talarico challenges the co-option of Christianity by the political right. He emphasizes that Christian principles, based on the teachings of Jesus, prioritize loving one's neighbor and helping the vulnerable over political affiliations or issues like abortion and gay marriage (5:05). He argues against Christian nationalism, stating it's a "worship of power in the name of Christ" and a betrayal of Jesus (8:04).

Separation of Church and State (6:25): Talarico explains his fight for the separation of church and state, citing his opposition to a bill requiring the Ten Commandments in schools. He believes this separation is vital for both the state and the church, as the church loses its prophetic voice when it becomes too involved with political power (7:11).

Campaign Misinformation (9:58): Talarico addresses a false quote attributed to him regarding a political opponent, clarifying that while he critiqued their campaigning, he never made racist remarks. He stresses the importance of lowering the political temperature and focusing on winning elections.

"Culture Wars" as a Diversion (12:10): Talarico discusses a bizarre legislative incident involving an internet hoax about "furries" in Texas schools. He uses this example to illustrate how "culture wars" are often a "smoke screen" to distract from more critical issues like economic policies that benefit the wealthy at the expense of ordinary citizens (13:44).

'I believe you just lied under oath': Dem Rep. asks Bondi about Trump's mentions in Epstein files

The video captures a heated exchange between Rep. Ted Lieu and Attorney General Pam Bondi concerning the handling of the Epstein files and the lack of prosecution against individuals involved (0:00). Key points from the discussion include: Redaction of Victim Photos: Lieu points out that photos of Epstein's victims were redacted to protect them, in accordance with congressional law (0:12). Protection of Epstein's Clients: Lieu accuses Bondi of protecting Epstein's clients, specifically mentioning former Prince Andrew, and questions why the investigation was shut down (1:04). Lack of Accountability: Lieu criticizes various Attorney Generals, including Merrick Garland and Bill Barr, for failing to pursue the Epstein case adequately and highlights Bondi's current inaction (2:00). Donald Trump's Involvement: The discussion escalates as Lieu brings up Donald Trump's presence in the Epstein files, asking if underage girls were present at any parties Trump attended with Epstein (2:30). Allegations of Lying Under Oath: Lieu directly accuses Bondi of lying under oath when she states there is no evidence of Trump committing a crime. He presents a witness statement from someone who claims to have heard Trump in a compromising conversation with Epstein and met a girl who alleged rape by both Trump and Epstein (3:45). Call for Interviewing Witnesses: Lieu urges the Department of Justice to interview this witness immediately, emphasizing the severity of the allegations (4:30). Demand for Resignation: Lieu concludes by calling for Bondi's resignation, expressing shame over the lack of accountability for the men involved in Epstein's sex trafficking operation (4:54).

Here Are The NEWLY UNREDACTED NAMES From The Epstein Files!

 

This video discusses the recent unredaction of names from the Epstein files, thanks to the efforts of Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie (0:00). These congressmen went to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and discovered that 70-80% of the files were still redacted, including the names of six wealthy and powerful men (0:07-0:33). After their intervention, the DOJ acknowledged their mistake and revealed these names. Here are the key points from the discussion: Newly Revealed Names (0:48): The video names the six individuals whose names were unredacted: Salvatore Nav'ora Zorab Mikolads Leapig Leonor Nicola Caputo Sultan Ahmed bin Soliam, CEO of Dubai Ports World Leslie Wexner, billionaire businessman and former Victoria's Secret CEO Sultan Ahmed bin Soliam (2:23): He is identified as the individual who sent a torture video to Epstein, which Epstein allegedly "loved" (2:44-2:55). The video notes that since he is not an American citizen, justice through the U.S. legal system might be limited (3:28). Salvatore Nurara (5:29): He was a former NYPD detective and one of Epstein's contacts in his "little black book." He was previously investigated in connection with an escort service, though unrelated to Epstein (5:38-6:03). Nicola Caputo (6:26): An Italian politician who now works in agriculture, his name appeared in records linked to Epstein from a 2009 New York Police Department list (6:35-6:42). Leslie Wexner (6:57): Congressman Thomas Massie publicly called out the DOJ for attempting to protect Wexner by redacting his name, a redaction that was later reversed after Massie's intervention (8:16-9:41). Congressional Pressure and Transparency (4:10): The video highlights the crucial role of Congress members like Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie, and Marjorie Taylor Greene in pressuring the DOJ to release the unredacted files, emphasizing their ability to create change despite bureaucracy (4:30-5:23). The video explains that congressional immunity protects members of Congress, like Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, from lawsuits when they make statements while on duty, particularly on the House floor (20:27-21:26). This immunity allows them to: Name names and discuss sensitive information, such as the alleged co-conspirators in the Epstein files, without fear of litigation (20:27-20:33). Speak freely and be "fiery" about what's actually going on, as Thomas Massie is described when speaking on the House floor compared to cable news interviews (21:16-21:26). The speaker contrasts this with the situation for survivors, who would likely face lawsuits and financial ruin if they were to publicly name perpetrators (20:57-21:03). Reactions of Lawmakers to Unredacted Files (11:12): Lauren Boebert (11:39): The Congresswoman expressed strong agreement with the idea that those implicated should face consequences and that Ghislaine Maxwell should not receive clemency (12:08-12:26). Cynthia Lummis (13:34): The Senator initially "didn't care" about the Epstein case but changed her view after seeing the files, acknowledging it was "worth investigating" (13:42-14:03). Jamie Raskin (15:47): The Congressman stated that the files showed evidence of victims as young as nine years old (15:54-15:59). Immunity for Congress Members (20:27): The video explains that members of Congress are immune from lawsuits when making statements while on duty, such as on the House floor. This protection allows them to speak freely about issues like the Epstein files without fear of litigation (20:36-21:26), which is not the case for survivors who might be sued if they publicly name alleged perpetrators (18:24-18:31).

New poll: Democrats seize advantage heading into midterms

Clintons refuse to testify in Congressional Epstein probe

Trump REBUKED at every turn; Courts and Congress show new spine as Ameri...

Rep. Jasmine Crockett On Her Senate Campaign: 'I Plan To Get It Done' | ...

MTG delivers a parting message to Republicans as she leaves Congress

WATCH: Hakeem Jeffries DUKES IT OUT With Republican Congressman