Politics Central: maga

Showing posts with label maga. Show all posts

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Epstein files: Epstein-Bannon texts spark MAGA civil war, Wexner gets deposed

This video discusses two main topics related to the Epstein files:

Steve Bannon's text messages and interview with Jeffrey Epstein:

Newly released text messages between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein have caused a "civil war" within the MAGA world (0:00).

In one message, Bannon suggested President Trump should be removed from office due to "erratic behavior" (0:07).

The Department of Justice also released a two-hour video of Bannon interviewing Epstein for a potential documentary (0:13).

Bannon claims his communication with Epstein was to "secure 50 hours of interviews from a reclusive subject" (1:23).

David Urban, former Trump campaign adviser, states that no MAGA supporters are backing Bannon, largely due to concerns about him trying to rehabilitate a sex offender (2:42).

Urban also believes that these revelations, particularly the 25th Amendment reference, will further distance Bannon from the current administration (3:59).

Les Wexner's congressional testimony:

Les Wexner, the billionaire former owner of Victoria's Secret, is giving congressional testimony about his connections to Jeffrey Epstein (4:31).

Wexner claims he was "conned," has "done nothing wrong," and has "nothing to hide" (4:47).

He states that Epstein stole hundreds of millions of dollars from his family (4:53).

Wexner's attorneys told investigators in 2019 that Epstein managed Wexner's money since the 1980s until an initial state investigation in Florida (5:31).

Lawmakers are interested in "following the money" as Epstein's wealth, much of which came from Wexner, gave him "entree into that whole world" of the rich and powerful (6:28).

The House Oversight Committee has significant questions about the large amount of money transferred from Wexner to Epstein (7:24).

Wexner states he cut ties with Epstein in 2007 (5:04), and unlike with some other powerful individuals, the Epstein files do not show continued communication between them (7:31).

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Elites Forced To RESIGN After Epstein Files Expose Them

The video discusses the resignations of Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem and Katherine Rumler due to their ties with Jeffrey Epstein (0:50, 2:21).

Here are the key points:

Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem's Resignation (0:46-0:56): Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, CEO of Dubai port operator DP World, resigned because of his close relationship with Epstein. Their friendship dated back to at least 2006 and continued until Epstein's death (1:00-1:05). Epstein even claimed that Bin Sulayem was "basically in charge of the port" (1:10-1:13). Their association reportedly helped build the partnership between Israel and the UAE (1:15-1:16). The video mentions that the Dubai port, run by Bin Sulayem, was unique for not requiring customs, making it a hub for illicit activities (6:41-7:05).

Katherine Rumler's Resignation (2:21-2:27): Katherine Rumler, general counsel for Goldman Sachs and former White House counsel under Barack Obama, also stepped down due to her connections with Epstein. Epstein provided her with various gifts, including money and luxury items (2:40-2:58). Rumler was scheduled to visit Epstein's island in 2017, and in early 2019, she gave him advice on how to dispute claims about his 2008 plea deal (3:06-3:29). She was even briefly listed as a backup executor of Epstein's will (3:34-3:37).

Government and Media Complicity (4:20-5:31): The hosts express frustration that the government and media have allegedly covered up information related to Epstein's activities for decades. They claim that the government knew about Epstein's actions but chose to protect the predators instead of the victims (5:37-5:50).

Israel Connection (5:56-6:05, 9:25-9:42): The video repeatedly highlights a strong connection between Epstein's network and Israel, suggesting that the protection offered to Epstein by various entities might be related to this connection. They mention Epstein's donation to the IDF (11:15-11:18) and the release of Israeli spies after 9/11 (12:00-12:08) as further evidence of this alleged influence.

Jeffrey Epstein: The Autopsy Details No One Is Talking About

In this video, Lauren the Mortician discusses the controversial death of Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the autopsy details and surrounding circumstances (0:00). She highlights new information from an interview with Epstein's brother on Megyn Kelly's podcast, where autopsy photos, including one of his neck, were shared for the first time (0:20-0:32).

Key points and concerns raised by Lauren include:

Unusual Markings (0:59-1:02): The ligature marks on Epstein's neck do not appear "textbook" for a self-unnaliving by suspension. She notes the mark is mid-neck and horizontal, lacking the typical upward tracking seen in such cases (10:02).

Timeline Discrepancies and Procedural Failures (1:41-5:55):

Epstein was arrested on July 6, 2019, and found injured in his cell on July 23, with a bedsheet around his neck (2:33-3:04). He claimed his cellmate attacked him (3:26).

He was placed on suicide watch but removed a week later (4:02-4:13).

The night he died, his cellmate was released, leaving him alone (4:31-4:40).

Guards allegedly failed to conduct required 30-minute checks for 8 hours (4:56-5:02).

A camera near his cell conveniently malfunctioned (5:14-5:22).

Epstein was found unresponsive on August 10 at 6:30 AM (5:28-5:34).

Autopsy Findings and Disagreements (6:00-8:18): Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, hired forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden to observe the autopsy (6:27-6:32).

Dr. Baden estimated the time of death around 4:30 AM, two hours before Epstein was found (7:29-7:38).

Dr. Baden noted three fractures in Epstein's neck (left thyroid cartilage, right thyroid cartilage, and hyoid bone), which he had never seen in a self-unnaliving case (7:40-7:59).

The medical examiner's office maintained that these fractures could occur in both self-unnaliving and manual compression (8:01-8:11), leading to a disagreement between professionals (8:11-8:18).

Concerns about CPR and Documentation (11:06-12:47): Lauren questions the initiation of CPR if Epstein had been deceased for hours, noting that a body gone for that long would show clear physical indicators of death. She also finds it unusual that active compressions were photographed in the ambulance, given the high-profile nature and controlled environment of a federal facility.

The CPR photos raise questions for several reasons:

The speaker notes that if someone had been without circulation for hours, as Dr. Baden suggested regarding Epstein's potential earlier time of death, the body would not feel freshly collapsed (11:11-11:21). It would show physiological changes like cooling, skin changes, and blood settling (11:21-11:30).

The speaker finds it unusual to see photos of active compressions being performed on Jeffrey Epstein's body while it was being documented in the back of an ambulance (11:42-11:48).

Given that Epstein's death occurred in a supposedly locked, controlled federal facility involving a high-profile inmate, the act of cutting him down after potentially being deceased for hours, placing him on a gurney, initiating compressions, and also documenting it in photos, is described as not typical (12:05-12:47).

Lack of Usable Camera Footage (13:14-14:17): The camera directly outside Epstein's cell, which would have provided crucial information, was not functioning properly. Lauren emphasizes that video footage would have quieted speculation but its absence only fuels it.

Call for Further Investigation (15:30-16:18): Lauren raises the question of why Mark Epstein has not requested an additional autopsy, as he has the legal right and ability to do so, especially given his public questioning of the findings.

Lauren concludes that the totality of the circumstances—the timeline, markings, fractures, and procedural handling—does not "feel clean" and leaves her with more questions than answers, suggesting that the public's continued interest in the case is justified due to its unresolved nature and layers of coincidences (13:03-13:12, 16:51-17:16, 17:56-17:58).

Panel: How MAGA turned on Trump & Bondi over Epstein files

The video discusses the controversy surrounding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the backlash faced by Pam Bondi and the Trump administration from MAGA supporters (0:00).

Key points from the discussion include:

Pam Bondi's congressional hearing performance (0:32-1:15): Bondi is criticized for acting like a "campaign surrogate" rather than an attorney general, refusing to answer questions, and yelling at a Democratic House hearing.

MAGA's negative reaction (1:20-2:21): MAGA hosts express outrage and disappointment with Bondi's performance, calling it "embarrassing" and accusing her of incompetence and a cover-up. They feel betrayed by the lack of transparency regarding the Epstein co-conspirator documents.

Bondi's refusal to face victims (2:50-3:12): A powerful moment highlighted is Bondi's refusal to look at Epstein's victims who were present at the hearing, despite her role as an attorney general representing the people.

Political motivations and lack of justice (3:17-3:40): The panel suggests Bondi's actions were a performance for Donald Trump, who later praised her for "sticking it to the lunatic leftists." This further fuels the perception that the focus is on politics rather than justice for victims.

The role of the attorney general (4:01-5:16): The discussion delves into the distinction between a criminal defense attorney and a prosecutor, emphasizing that a prosecutor's role is quasi-judicial and involves investigating for justice, not representing a specific client in the same way a defense attorney does.

Definition of "pedophile" and victim ages (5:25-6:10): There's a debate about the legal definition of "pedophile" and the age of Epstein's victims, with some as young as nine years old being mentioned in unredacted documents.

Accusations of incompetence and cover-up (6:26-7:37): The panel further criticizes Bondi, calling her "inept, incompetent, and incapable," and accusing the administration of botching the communication and redaction process of the files.

"Whataboutism" and lack of accountability (7:44-8:45): A heated exchange occurs over "whataboutism," with one panelist refusing to deflect blame from the current administration by questioning previous administrations' actions. They assert that all parties involved have failed the Epstein victims.

DOJ tracking lawmakers' searches (8:46-10:22): The video concludes by discussing the controversial act of the Department of Justice tracking lawmakers who accessed the unredacted files, which even Speaker Mike Johnson condemned. This action is seen as feeding into a narrative of a politicized investigation not focused on victims.

Friday, February 13, 2026

How QAnon and Epstein blew up the justice system | If You're Listening

The video discusses how the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the rise of QAnon have eroded trust in the justice system. The core points are:

The Power of a Photograph (0:29-2:57): A single photo taken by Jeffrey Epstein in 2001, featuring Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and a 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, became crucial in exposing Epstein's activities and linking them to high-profile figures. This photo, initially circulated in tabloids, helped transform the story from a local issue into a global scandal.

From Obscurity to Conspiracy (2:58-7:06): Despite the photo, the Epstein story remained relatively obscure for years. However, it was picked up by conspiracy theorists and right-wing media, eventually migrating to anonymous online message boards like 4chan. These platforms, known for unregulated and often malicious content, became a breeding ground for unverified claims.

The Birth of Pizzagate and QAnon (7:07-13:07): The Epstein narrative merged with leaked Hillary Clinton emails on 4chan, leading to the creation of Pizzagate, a baseless conspiracy theory alleging a child sex ring run out of a pizza restaurant. This paved the way for QAnon, where an anonymous user ("Q") posted "drops" claiming a secret cabal of Satan-worshipping child predators was undermining Donald Trump. The real-life existence of Epstein lent false credibility to these fantastical claims.

Erosion of the Epistemic System (13:08-20:05): The video argues that the public's current distrust stems from a failing "epistemic system"—the established methods by which institutions (media, government, justice system) verify and organize knowledge.

Movies like Spotlight (14:16) highlighted institutional cover-ups, and the system's inability to effectively address the Epstein case led the public to feel they had to investigate themselves. Consequences of Collapsing Trust (20:06-23:47): The immense public pressure forced the release of millions of Epstein files, including images and victim names, without proper context or redaction. This has led to "mob justice," further spread of misinformation (like the revival of Pizzagate), and a breakdown of the traditional justice process, where the public becomes the investigator rather than the audience.