This video discusses the recent unredaction of names from the Epstein files, thanks to the efforts of Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie (0:00). These congressmen went to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and discovered that 70-80% of the files were still redacted, including the names of six wealthy and powerful men (0:07-0:33). After their intervention, the DOJ acknowledged their mistake and revealed these names.
Here are the key points from the discussion:
Newly Revealed Names (0:48): The video names the six individuals whose names were unredacted:
Salvatore Nav'ora
Zorab Mikolads
Leapig Leonor
Nicola Caputo
Sultan Ahmed bin Soliam, CEO of Dubai Ports World
Leslie Wexner, billionaire businessman and former Victoria's Secret CEO
Sultan Ahmed bin Soliam (2:23): He is identified as the individual who sent a torture video to Epstein, which Epstein allegedly "loved" (2:44-2:55). The video notes that since he is not an American citizen, justice through the U.S. legal system might be limited (3:28).
Salvatore Nurara (5:29): He was a former NYPD detective and one of Epstein's contacts in his "little black book." He was previously investigated in connection with an escort service, though unrelated to Epstein (5:38-6:03).
Nicola Caputo (6:26): An Italian politician who now works in agriculture, his name appeared in records linked to Epstein from a 2009 New York Police Department list (6:35-6:42).
Leslie Wexner (6:57): Congressman Thomas Massie publicly called out the DOJ for attempting to protect Wexner by redacting his name, a redaction that was later reversed after Massie's intervention (8:16-9:41).
Congressional Pressure and Transparency (4:10): The video highlights the crucial role of Congress members like Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie, and Marjorie Taylor Greene in pressuring the DOJ to release the unredacted files, emphasizing their ability to create change despite bureaucracy (4:30-5:23).
The video explains that congressional immunity protects members of Congress, like Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, from lawsuits when they make statements while on duty, particularly on the House floor (20:27-21:26).
This immunity allows them to:
Name names and discuss sensitive information, such as the alleged co-conspirators in the Epstein files, without fear of litigation (20:27-20:33).
Speak freely and be "fiery" about what's actually going on, as Thomas Massie is described when speaking on the House floor compared to cable news interviews (21:16-21:26).
The speaker contrasts this with the situation for survivors, who would likely face lawsuits and financial ruin if they were to publicly name perpetrators (20:57-21:03).
Reactions of Lawmakers to Unredacted Files (11:12):
Lauren Boebert (11:39): The Congresswoman expressed strong agreement with the idea that those implicated should face consequences and that Ghislaine Maxwell should not receive clemency (12:08-12:26).
Cynthia Lummis (13:34): The Senator initially "didn't care" about the Epstein case but changed her view after seeing the files, acknowledging it was "worth investigating" (13:42-14:03).
Jamie Raskin (15:47): The Congressman stated that the files showed evidence of victims as young as nine years old (15:54-15:59).
Immunity for Congress Members (20:27): The video explains that members of Congress are immune from lawsuits when making statements while on duty, such as on the House floor. This protection allows them to speak freely about issues like the Epstein files without fear of litigation (20:36-21:26), which is not the case for survivors who might be sued if they publicly name alleged perpetrators (18:24-18:31).
No comments:
Post a Comment